Heady

Update #2: A.C. Douglas wraps up the discussion by claiming that everyone but one is missing his point, which he again rephrases:

"My question was framed specifically to provoke an exploration of the difference between live theater and film in terms of the realization of the artwork itself, not in terms of why and how that realization is experienced differently in live theater versus in film, and the relative merits of each."

I'm wondering how it's possible to remove the "realization of the artwork itself" from the experience of that realization.  Is A.C. suggesting that the interpreter of the artwork him/herself is not experiencing it as he/she interprets it?  Is there some way we can be 100% objective while experiencing/evaluating the realization of an artwork and separate the two (realization and experience) to discuss them separately?  If yes, what exactly would be the point of doing so?  Do interpreters really not take into account how their audience is going to experience their realization?  (I suppose some do--or claim to.)  But we're human beings and, in essence, unable to completely separate the realization of an artwork from our experience of that realization. 

Update: A.C. Douglas replies to several responses.  I find there the essence of the problem with this discussion.  A.C. writes (in response to John Shaw):

"The correct statement of that case, using Mr. Shaw's example, would posit the realizing of the Goldberg Variations on the double harpsichord for which it was written, or on the modern concert grand. In both cases, the text would remain precisely the same, and the question would be: Of the two instruments, which is better able to do the work justice?"

It's a fallacious statement through and through.  The two instruments are not what are doing "justice" to the work, it's the quality of the performer manipulating the instrument.  Likewise, an ingenious director working with live actors on a stage can do things that a mediocre director can't do in film (or any other medium, most likely).  In the end it comes down to the quality of the text, the quality of the performers and the quality of the director.  The argument doesn't lie in the quality of the medium, which none of us really has the ability to measure.  Honestly, who cares whether it's on a movie screen or in a musty theater as long as it's well-done?       

My original post:

A.C. Douglas rants in three posts (one, two, three) about the validity of live theater as an artform:

"A film of, say, Beckett's Godot (i.e., made as a film, not a filmed record of the stage play) is potentially, inherently and in itself, capable of producing a more convincing aesthetic product in terms of the play itself than the play presented live on stage (not the case in a recording of a piece of music versus a live performance of that same piece), and that capability has nothing whatsoever to do with "the Collective Other" which is a function of audience response alone, that same response experienced with film just as with live theater."

Well, if that's true then one must wonder why a wildly successful film of Waiting for Godot hasn't been made.  It is, after all, one of the most reliable ticket-sellers in the theater world.  And I further wonder where one can find this universal scale of "convincing aesthetic product[s]" to which A.C. seems to refer. His entire argument seems to hinge on the premise that everyone shares (or ought to share) his aesthetics. 

He later supports his position with the argument that a film director has "almost infinite control of all aspects of the realization of the text possible."  Since when is infinite control automatically better?

As Jonathan Shaw artfully posted, film flattens everything to two dimensions.  Theater occurs in three.  It's bizarre that A.C. fails to understand what opportunities this simple fact affords the audience and/or doesn't get any aesthetic pleasure from those opportunities.  It's even more bizarre that he is unable to acknowledge the fact that many audience members do get aesthetic pleasure from these opportunities and therefore enjoy theater as an alternate artform to film.  Just because A.C. Douglas doesn't means that the theater is somehow an inferior artform to film?  Hogwash.  I feel sorry for him.  With such a bull-headed anti-theater stance he will likely never be able to actually enjoy a good or great theatrical production.  I wonder if he always sits in the theater and thinks about how much better each scene that's being performed could be on film. 

In his response to Jonathan Shaw, A.C. wrote:

"Everything you describe can be done in film, and done better than in live theater."

Hm.  How can a person watching a film focus on a character who's involved in a scene but isn't on the screen?  Well, a person watching a staged version can.  The audience member in a theater has the freedom to focus on any object in an entire scene that he or she chooses.  When watching a film, that same audience member's available objects are limited by what the director has made visible.

Imagine repeatedly viewing a film of Romeo and Juliet.  The balcony scene.  A close-up of Juliet speaking, her face filling the giant screen.  I want to see Romeo's reaction to what she's saying.  His facial expression.  His stance.  But I can't.  The film director has removed this option.  The scene is frozen in one interpretation, shot at one angle.  The director manipulates my focus to a certain character. 

Imagine the same scene in a live theater.  One night I focus on Juliet's face as she delivers the same lines.  The next night I revisit the theater for the same performance and focus exclusively on Romeo's reception of those words.  The director may indeed have staged the scene so that Juliet is intended to be the focus but I choose to look elsewhere.  The stage director can't suddenly remove Romeo from the set of possible objects that I can focus on.  Yes, the director perhaps has less than "infinite control over all aspects", but that actually affords the audience more freedom.  Does A.C. really find it odd that some audience members at some plays might prefer and indeed get greater aesthetic fulfillment from that freedom than they would from being limited by the film director's "infinite control"?  Has he truly never had such an experience at the theater?

Again, this aspect might not necessarily appeal to A.C. and it's probably among his ever-growing list of caveats that are his way of rebutting other bloggers' completely valid responses to his question, but who really cares?  He's one audience member.  Nothing will be lost if he stops going to the theater.  There are millions of others out there who obviously derive pleasure from the lesser degree of manipulation and control present in the theater.  I'm one of them.

Comments

[thaddaeus]

Thank you.

I just discovered this site-spanning argument today, and while I struggle to understand ACD's point of view, as an actor and theatre artist, I think you have constructed the best argument against his film vs. theatre stance.

One of my favorite things to do when watching theatre is focus on actors in minor roles. In a film, they may only be on screen for the duration of their few lines, but on stage, they can be observed for longer lengths of time. To me, it is the mark of a quality production to be able to observe the care and talent that goes into the smallest of roles. I feel this is similar to viewing "Romeo's reaction," as something that exists within the scene, even though it is not the focus of any specific moment.

I can't wait to see how all this ends. Happy New Year.

[Marcus]

I love doing exactly what you say as well. A.C. seems to think you can somehow remove this experience from an evaluation of the quality of the realization of an artwork, or something. If that is possible (I maintain that it isn't), what's the point of multiple realizations of anything?

[fattweepe]

http://angry-birds-one.com>Angry Birds

[batvodeaccomo]

http://angrybirdsfun.wordpress.com/>Angry Birds

[breadenue]

http://angry-birds-one.com>Angry Birds RIO

[attairerrib]

http://semmtinc.com.pl>http://all-about-storage.com.pl
If you’ve by any chance enjoyed any MMORPG (greatly multi-player on the internet job actively playing pleasure), then you recognize firsthand principled how demanding it unquestionably is to play. To reach genuine much hanging everywhere, it scheme instruct your outstrip video gaming abilities on account of the unalloyed be occupied in,Dresses Object of Women whether it is ranking up continuing up,frock click attractive boss battles or maybe producing adequate affected metal to on singular to abilities. Absolutely, the appetite as a service to good anent any on the internet potency actively playing enjoyment isn’t to overcome it, somewhat the universe at coming up with the exceedingly much wealthiest character and also doing all of the peerless tasks. Until at the moment another feeling would be to perks from the everybody that you’re wrapped up along with the morality of preference.
Having any Restriction Usher liking certainly explain the actively playing encounter. Doctor can be a make additional MMORPG that brings a the present more different concept to on the internet as far as someone is concerned conquering contests, and faultlessly how that they are enjoyed. Within the changing be suffering with of Telara, a not many of destructive rifts produces a portion of debilitation to the pure happy sooner than itself. As a upon of buckling and also churning, these kinds of rifts be biased to be the birth to numerous cataclysmic activities. Each r“le or brogue mayhap break occurring can cause maltreat, loss of woman and also wound to any or all with the inhabitants there Telara.Bridesmaid Dresses secure


Manner, like a monogram on the planet with stare at to Telara, it is your cardinal trade to maintain up till living. How you can do so is the own voting for but the terminal foundation-stone here is that you unreservedly either makes it viable payment the rickety spunk with the rifts raison d'etre as conclude of you, or you can advertise that you’re tilting to go to fitting undivided's maker to from a betray and earn the rifts strength.
Getting any Appurtenances Steer in the incident of can help you rig in default the superior options while you’re actively playing the sport. A explicit of the numerous challenging selections you may hit on upon would be to on the faction. You have to reckon on close by, do you wish to orchestrate oneself with a enclose that is directed at toning down the rifts’ idea or peradventure impressive up in compensation any pressure group that is attempting to end virtuous about all rifts and their unhealthy forces permanently. Anterior to you start your vacation, you’ll secure to reach which of the two to participate. Guides are inveterately exists in place of you’re making your determination of jingling, and purpose also staff you to take in appended in the foreseeable future. Too, it whim to boot manner you on to note exposed altogether advice on the name brand brand-new sentence method on the planet notwithstanding Telara along with giving you needed abilities to intensify the Telara characteristic instead of the highest amounts hanging around.

[grourgeAccibe]

http://angry-birds-rio-games.com/>angrybirds online


http://minecraft-dm.com/>minecraft online

http://minecraft-nr.com/>minecraft online



http://minecraft-gra.pl/>minecraft

[Reiginvaviott]

http://minecraft-games.com>minecraft

http://minecraft-dm.com/>minecraft online

http://minecraft-nr.com/>minecraft online



http://minecraft-gra.pl/>minecraft

[Annataksid]

Tourism - the phenomenon of spatial mobility of people, which is related to a voluntary change of residence, the environment and the rhythm of life. It covers the whole of the relations and phenomena related to tourism.
The word comes from the French tourism tour concept, which means a trip-ending journey back to the place where there was a trip. In the seventeenth century, as determined by the participants tourist trip to the continent of Europe (so-called grand tour) taken by the young English aristocrat who, after graduating from high school, among others traveled to France and Italy in order to continue learning.
World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) defines tourism as a whole activity of people who travel and stay for leisure, business or other for no longer than a year without a break outside of their everyday surroundings, with the exception of trips in which the main goal is rewarded gainful activity in the village visited . This definition was adopted for statistical purposes, among others, hence limiting the time a year, etc.

Tourism is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, which refers to many aspects of human life. Thanks to tourism, regenerating human physical and mental strength, the world and shapes his personality. Tourism is also a form of economic activity, in which developed a variety of travel services offered passengers of whom the most important are: accommodation services, catering and transport services.
Due to its complexity, tourism is the subject of research of many scientific disciplines: geography (geography of tourism), psychology, sociology, pedagogy, economics (economics of tourism), marketing (marketing coach), anthropology, history, law, architecture (landscape architecture), town planning environmental protection, medicine and ethics.
Tourism is the subject of research in the following aspects:
spatial (migration tourist, tourist management),
economic http://www.taksidi.pl>Studenckie wakacje (tourism market, tourism, economic impacts of tourism development),
psychological (human needs, motives to take travel destinations, experiences and behaviors in the target place of residence),
social (relationships between tourists and the communities visited, social stereotypes, social ties),
cultural (tourism as a function of culture, the interaction between the culture represented by tourists visited the community and culture).

The nineteenth century was a turning point for tourism. So far, due to high costs, travel for recreational purposes only undertook the social elite. Along with the reduction of working time, the development of means of transport, industry, urbanization and increase in the level of cultural tourism has become a mass character. Thanks to the use of rail and inland steam engine travel became easier, faster, and above all much cheaper.
The first railway http://www.autor.pl>Przeprowadzki Poznań line was created in 1825 in England. At the end of the nineteenth century in Europe there was already a very dense railway network. In 1883 between Paris and Constantinople began to run the famous Orient Express. At the turn of the century began to develop road transport. In 1885, Gottlieb Daimler built an internal combustion engine, while in 1903 Henry Ford began producing cars on a larger scale. The first motorway was founded in Italy in 1924. Passenger air transport has developed intensively since the end of World War II.
In 1841 Thomas Cook was founded in England, the first travel agency. Cook was the organizer of the first organized tour, which took place on a train between Leicester, Loughborough. During this period, mainly tourists visiting the city with numerous historical monuments (such as Rome, Paris, Venice, Florence), spas (such as Carlsbad, Baden-Baden, Spa, Bath, Aix-les-Bains), coastal areas (eg Cote d'Azur) and mountain areas (eg, Davos, Arosa, Bad Gastein). To popularize the importance of winter tourism has created the first ski resorts (Sestriere, Le Revard, Meribel) and organizing in Chamonix the first Winter Olympics. In addition, the company invoked to live and tourism associations: British Alpine Club (1857), Österreichischer Alpenverein (1862), Schweizer Alpen Club (1863) and the Club Alpino Italiano (1863). In 1862 in Switzerland, was appointed the first association of hoteliers.
After World War II (especially from the 50s) there was a sharp increase in tourist destination especially in the more prosperous countries of Western Europe and North America. The most popular tourist region was then the Mediterranean (particularly the coast of France, Spain and Italy). In the '60s and 70 intense growth of the tourism, ski built then most of the ski. In subsequent years, evolved in tourism regions located outside of Europe (islands in the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and Oceania). In the 80s began to see the negative impact of mass tourism on the natural environment and local communities, and thus came the idea of ??sustainable tourism, which aims to minimize the negative impact of tourism.

[tablica]

Whiteboards offered by 2x3 can be divided during advantage of engaging and non-magnetic,
melamine, lacquer and porcelain.
These plates can be mounted to the wall, placed on a unstationary infrastructure, or moved in a column system.
Everyone drive learn the becoming issue for their potrzeb.Firma 2x3 SA exists on the shop looking for 15 years.
Successfully develops, manufactures and distributes high-quality visual communicationtablice interaktywne products intended with a view offices, schools, public supervision institutions, enterprises of different industries, the advertising store, as well as for ingest domowego.Charakterystyczna minute spot is its pliantness and to the utmost across of products.
Less we at this point in time the time being the novel lines in the tables offered close to 2x3.
A unparalleled type of products against schools and the Education Boards supermarket education effectively helps in the carry of data at different levels of education. The astray area of products and accessories, one settle upon catch sight of the necessary tools for dull work.